Which statement about withholding information during discovery is true?

• A. All identifying information must always be disclosed
• B. No redactions are allowed under any circumstances
• C. Some identifying information may be withheld to protect privacy
• D. Redactions apply only to victims

Answer: (C)

In discovery, you balance getting relevant information with protecting people’s privacy. Because of that balance, some identifying information may be withheld or redacted to protect privacy while still allowing the case to proceed fairly. Courts expect redactions to be narrowly tailored and often require a protective order or stipulation to govern how the information is shared and used.

So this statement is true because it reflects the practical reality that privacy concerns can justify withholding identifying details (like names, addresses, or contact information) when disclosure would be harmful or unnecessary for the dispute.

The other options are too absolute or narrow. Disclosing all identifying information is not required when privacy interests or legal protections apply. Saying no redactions are allowed under any circumstances ignores established procedures for protecting sensitive data. And restricting redactions only to victims ignores that redactions can apply to a range of sensitive information and contexts beyond victims.